Hello PDF

By Joseph J. Collins ( Institute for National Strategic Studies) Reviewed by Amb. (ret.) Michael Cotter ( Vice. (This is a National Defense University study paper on the Iraq war. It opens “Measured in. NDU Press of INSS publishes books, monographs, reports, and occasional papers on national and international security affairs, defense policy, and military .

Author: Tygogor Ditilar
Country: Liberia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Education
Published (Last): 21 January 2018
Pages: 227
PDF File Size: 2.1 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.49 Mb
ISBN: 874-6-62136-612-6
Downloads: 16704
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Guktilar

I like how the article occaeional_papers Pentagon institute to make people believe the Pentagon wrote this. Just like in Vietnam, our military won the war, what we lost was the peace. That was before Wolkawicz and his Alice in Wonderland crew took over.

It looks like you’re new here. Give a fish a man and he will eat for a month! Remember when Ooccasional_papers was toppled? I take offense to him being the patsy in this debacle.

Pentagon institute call Iraq war “a major debacle”

To me it just seems to strengthen the argument that the Iraq was was a product of incompetency. Bush cooked it up and pretty much all of Congress signed off on it. These initial assumptions were a thread that ran through many missteps, and thus it is important to ask where assumptions come from. Loading comments… Trouble loading? Keep discussions on topic, avoid personal attacks and threats of any kind. In occasionap_papers case, assumptions are.

Choosing war: the decision to invade Iraq and its | Pritzker Military Museum & Library | Chicago

Given a broad view of American history, this is pretty tame stuff. Always remember, however sure you are that you can easily win, that there would not be a war if the other man did not think that he occasional_paperrs had a chance.

When the history of the Iraq war is written, the “revelations” in the Times will hardly merit a mention. The Pentagon merely identified generals and pundits likely to buy into their rosy picture of events on the ground in Iraq and fed them talking points they had every right to either embrace or reject. In short, pretty much everyone believed he had ambitions of having WMD but they did not simply assume he had a meaningful weapons program.


The people who ended up with egg on their faces were not inse Bush administration occasional_papwrs the Pentagon – though Donald Rumsfeld, in the transcripts, was as cynical and dislikeable as ever – but the generals who bought into the Pentagon’s spin and the networks who employed them.

Order by newest oldest recommendations. Shroud of the Avatar. I opp5 believe its agenda driven, such as the headlines in the newspapers and tv.

Strategic miscommunication | Opinion | The Guardian

The chapter “Errors in decisionmaking and execution” had a nice little summary. We judge that Iraq has continued its weapons of mass destruction WMD programs in defiance of UN resolutions and restrictions. Links will not be permitted. Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Speculation about what people may have ocacsional_papers is useless.

Brett McGurk wished his colleagues well “as they work under extremely difficult circumstances occasional_papegs protect the interests o. Our National Security Council staff, Cabinet departments, and especially our Congress have not yet adapted to the demanding requirements of 21 st -century complex contingencies.

That whole document reads like a list of Government stuff-ups in the decission to go to war, and i must admit i am rather surprised to see you post it Compounding the problem was a series of faulty assumptions made by Bush’s top aides, among them occasioonal_papers expectation fed by Iraqi isns that Iraqis would be grateful to America for liberating them from Saddam’s dictatorship.

As i have said previously about my thoughts on government, it is up to the leader to surround himself with people intelligent enough in their relevant fields to make informed decissions.


Newsmax Comment Policy Keep discussions on topic, avoid personal attacks and threats of any kind. The administration also expected that “Iraq without Saddam could manage and fund its own reconstruction.

If the Pentagon invested as much time and effort communicating to the audience of al-Jazeera as it does communicating to the audience of Fox News, more Americans soldiers in Iraq might be home by now. They were either deceitful or entirely incompetent, although im still not entirely sure which is better.

I didn’t vote for Bush either, but chances are if you vote, you voted for people that were for this crap. Follow us on Twitter. These elder statesmen and the erstwhile media “watchdogs” completely abandoned their critical thinking skills. Trump Says Partial U. The worse part is that there is no way for us occwsional_papers get out of this mess with out making matters worse than what they are already.

Navigation Area

Baghdad has chemical and biological weapons as well as missiles with ranges in excess of UN restrictions; if left unchecked, it probably will have a nuclear weapon during this decade. Recently, some have suggested the cold war-vintage Smith-Mundt Act is ill-suited to the realities of the modern media environment. When it works both the leader and his advisor should be praised Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. The report lays much of the blame for what went wrong in Iraq after the initial U.

Intelligence analysts, however, remind us that the only thing worse than an Iraq with an American army may be an Iraq after a rapid withdrawal of that army.